Dunkin’ Donuts c. Berticoinc, Part I: The Benchmark Approach to Lost Profits
20 July, 2015
Ephraim Stulberg
Canada
In April 2015, the Quebec Court of Appeal released its decision in Dunkin’ Brands Canada Ltd. c. Bertico inc. 2015 QCCA 624. The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s ruling (Bertico inc. c. Dunkin’ Brands Canada Ltd., 2012 QCCS 2809) that Dunkin’ Donuts did not make appropriate efforts to stave off the impact of the rapid expansion of the rival Tim Horton’s chain into Quebec, and agreed that Dunkin’ Donuts was liable for having breached its contractual duties, as well as its duty of good faith to its Quebec franchisees. Where the Court of Appeal did find take issue was with some elements of the trial judge’s damages award, reducing it from $16.4M to $10.9M. In the next two posts, I will comment on some of the interesting damages of the aspects of the appeal. This post deals with the issue of the proper application of the “benchmark” approach to lost profits calculations.
Introduction
Dunkin’ Donuts had historically had a strong brand in the province of Quebec. Beginning in the mid-1990s, Tim Horton’s made a strong play to expand into the Quebec market, at the expense of Dunkin’ Donuts. In spite of repeated pleas from franchisees for assistance from the franchisor, Dunkin’ Donuts share of the Quebec market declined precipitously, from 12.5% in 1995 to only 4.6% in 2003, and many of its franchisees were forced to cease operating altogether due to unprofitability. A group of 21 plaintiff franchisees were ultimately awarded damages for both a) lost profits and b) loss of investment/business value.
The Damages Award
At trial, the parties put forth competing models to project the sales at the plaintiff franchise locations “but for” the failure of Dunkin’ Donuts to properly support the system. One model proposed by the plaintiff’s expert accountant was to assume that the plaintiff stores would have grown their sales at a rate of growth equal to that achieved by Tim Horton’s during the damages period. This methodology is generally referred to as the “benchmark” approach (it is referred to the “comparable” approach by the trial judge [103]). Under this methodology, one projects a plaintiff’s sales during a loss-affected period, but for the alleged wrongdoing, based on the actual results of a similar yet unaffected firm during the same period.
On appeal, Dunkin’ Donuts noted that Tim Horton’s primary competitor in the period in question was, in fact, Dunkin’ Donuts. Using Tim Horton’s actual growth rate during the loss period was not an appropriate measure, since Tim Horton’s actual rate of sales growth in Quebec had been positively affected by the failure of Dunkin’ Donuts to support its brand. In projecting store sales in the hypothetical “but for” world, in which Dunkin’ Donuts is assumed to have acted properly, Tim Horton’s sales would have been lower, and it is this lower growth rate that ought to have been applied. The Court of Appeal accepted this argument, and decided that it would be more appropriate to use 75% of Tim Horton’s growth rate to project the plaintiffs’ sales.
Problems with the Benchmark Approach in Franchise Litigation
The (mis)application of the benchmark approach in the Dunkin’ Donuts case illustrates both the attractiveness of the benchmark approach, as well as one of its drawbacks.
The benchmark approach to projecting sales can, at first glance, be very appealing, and especially so in franchise litigation involving an individual franchise, where there would appear to be many businesses that are very similar to the plaintiff, whose results can be used as a sort of “control group”.
The danger is that one might select a control group that is so similar to the plaintiff business that the damage caused to the plaintiff actually affects the control group as well. To illustrate, consider the following example.
A number of years ago, I had to quantify lost profits at a particular location for one of the largest franchise restaurant systems in Canada. The location (the “Loss Location”) had experienced flood damage caused by one of its contractors, and had to close for approximately 8 months (the “Loss Period”). I considered two potential approaches to projecting lost sales :
- Based on the rate of year-over-year growth experienced in the 12 months prior to the incident.
- Based on the actual rate of sales growth of nearby, unaffected stores during the Loss Period.
Both of these approaches proved problematic. Year-over-year growth at the Loss Location had been spectacularly high; upon inquiring, I was informed that nearby locations of that chain had undergone renovations the prior year, causing a diversion of customers to the Loss Location. Such a spike in sales would not have persisted following the completion of renovations to the nearby stores.
And of course, results at nearby stores during the loss period were skewed by two factors: the diversion of customers who normally would have dined at the Loss Location to other, nearby locations; and the natural increase in sales at the nearby locations following the completion of their renovations.
The correct approach in that case (or at least, the one I adopted) was to:
- Use a pre-incident base period that eliminated the effect of the one-time increase in sales at the Loss Location due to renovations at nearby stores; and,
- Use a broader benchmark group, consisting of all stores outside of a particular radius of the Loss Location. These stores would not have received much in the way of diverted customers, and the sample group was large enough that the effect of location-specific events such as renovations (which were being carried out on a staggered basis within the system) would be only minimal.
Reconstructing the “But For” World
The issue dealt with the Quebec Court of Appeal also suggests a broader frame of analysis.
It is tempting to assume that the effect of a wrongdoing has been limited to the plaintiff, and that otherwise results in the actual world were unaffected and can be used to recreate the “but for” world. But, perhaps more often than we care to believe, a wrongdoing involving a single company can have a sort of “butterfly effect” on things such as market size price. This can be the case even when the injured party is only a small part of its market. I will provide other examples of this in future posts, but for now I conclude with the following lesson:
Lesson
If using an outside benchmark to project the results of the plaintiff but for the wrongdoing, be sure to fully consider the possible effect of the wrongdoing on that external benchmark.
The statements or comments contained within this article are based on the author’s own knowledge and experience and do not necessarily represent those of the firm, other partners, our clients, or other business partners.
Ephraim Stulberg
B.A, M.A, M.BA, CPA, CA, CBV, CFF, Partner/Senior Vice President
- +1 416.366.4968
- estulberg@mdd.com
- Toronto, ON, Canada
Articles
Relevant Articles
Our experts are extremely knowledgeable about thier subject areas and often write educational material and commentary on topical issues they come across.
CAT Insights – The Increasing Risk and Frequency of Wildfires
Depending on where you are located, you are likely to experience some sort of “weather disaster season,” such as hurricane season, cyclone season, tornado season, earthquake season, or wildfire season. I live in California where we have earthquake season, which...
Property Damage and Derechos
On 29th June 2023, a rare type of storm called a "derecho" swept across the Midwest region of the United States, mostly impacting the states of Missouri, Illinois and Iowa. The derecho began as a rotating supercell thunderstorm that spawned...
Benefits of Hindsight when Quantifying Financial Losses
Claims for economic losses arising out of failed real estate developments can be complex to prove, requiring evidence concerning many different aspects of the proposed construction project. There can also be different approaches to quantifying losses. Both of these issues...
Ghosts, Ghouls and Cyber Claims
We usually think of Hallowe’en when October rolls around; however, did you know that October is also cyber security awareness month? NetDiligence recently released the 12th iteration of their Cyber Claims Study. They analyzed approximately 7,500 cyber claims from period...
Lost Profits Measurement in the Cannabis Industry
What used to be considered an illicit drug in most countries is now a decriminalized plant with some medicinal potential. Cannabis is in the midst of a global transformation into a major industry with massive investment and growth potential. Canada...
Trends in Food and Beverage Related Product Recalls
Numerous large-scale product recalls have captured national, if not global, media attention. One example is the 2008 salmonella outbreak linked to products manufactured by the Peanut Corporation of America. This incident involved the recall of more than 4,000 products produced...
Business Interruption Measurement Considerations in a COVID-19 World
Although hurricane season doesn’t normally conclude until November 30th, we have already exhausted the modern English alphabet in terms of named hurricanes. In the last year, we’ve also seen an ever increasing number of wildfires, explosions and tropical storms. While...
Claim Considerations Related to the Beirut Port Explosion – Part 2
On 17 October 2019 large numbers of protesters began appearing in Martyrs Square, Nejmeh Square, and Hamra Street, as well as many other areas of Beirut and throughout Lebanon. The reasons for the protests are wide reaching from a social,...
Claim Considerations Related to the Beirut Port Explosion – Part 1
In this two-part series, we write about the claim considerations related to the Beirut port explosion on 4 August 2020. On 4 August 2020 at approximately 18:00 local time, an explosion measuring 3.3 on the Richter scale ripped through Beirut...
How to Calculate Losses Under Business Interruption Coverage
In this article we provide a brief overview of how to calculate losses under business interruption coverage. Broadly speaking, business interruption (“BI”) insurance coverage is meant to indemnify the insured for the loss of profit it suffers as a result...
Forensic Accounting Liability Exposures
The below article first appeared in THE STANDARD, New England’s Insurance Magazine. It features excerpts from a presentation given by MDD partners Paul McGowan, CPA, CVA and Jon Ducey, CPA, CVA on the topic of liability claims and other key...
Economic Damages from Personal Injury: A Forensic Accountant’s Perspective
Regrettably, individuals can experience a temporary or permanent diminishment in their ability to perform certain functions due to a tortfeasor. Forensic accountants and economists are regularly retained in matters involving the injury or death of an individual for the purpose...
Caribbean ‘vacation’ for CAT claims
As a global forensic accounting firm, we at MDD have a “boots on the ground” mentality when it comes to quantifying economic damages for catastrophe (“CAT”) claims. The busy hurricane season in 2017 meant that I, along with many of...
Valuing a Franchise System
Valuing a franchise system, or “franchisor”, is in many ways very similar to the valuation of any other type of business; it is a function of the forecasted levels of cash flows that the business will generate, and the risk...
Mining Claim – All Is Not As It Appears
In this briefing we focus on mining claims, and share our knowledge and technical expertise on one of the loss measurement issues regularly encountered in mining claims, production bottlenecks. What you will learn from reading the article include: How the...
Identifying and Measuring Short Duration Business Interruption Losses
What have we really lost? One of the most common issues that arise from short-duration interruptions, those measured in days as opposed to weeks or months, is whether the business actually suffered a permanent loss of revenue or whether the...
Contaminated Products Insurance Claims: How to Check the Costs of a Product Recall
The number of food product recalls reported in the UK through the FSA (Food Standards Agency) rose 78% in 2015. With many UK businesses operating internationally, a product recall situation can impact many countries and cost millions of pounds in...
Business Interruption: Complex Interdependencies
As business structures become more complex, companies often need more sophisticated insurance products to properly manage their business interruption risks. For example, narrow vertical integration makes risk management more difficult and increases the demands placed on insurers regarding correct risk...
Catastrophe Events and Business Interruption Insurance
In the event of a devastating catastrophe (“cat”) be it an earthquake, hurricane, flood, or tornado, the first and foremost priority is to ensure the safety all the people involved. Once this has been established, business owners can then begin...
A Primer To Accurately Calculating Lost Profits
What Are Lost Profits and How Are They Calculated? Lost profits are economic damages caused by a disruption in business operations. The damages can be the result of a variety of factors, some of which include patent infringement, breach of...
I Lost My Customers and It’s Your Fault!
In Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP v. Werbin, 2015, an action was put forward by Schwartz Levitsky Feldman (SLF) claiming loss of profits due to the departure of Mr. Werbin. The firm contended that they purchased Werbin’s clients when they purchased...
Foreign Exchange Issues in Damage Quantification: Part II – Applying the Concepts
In the previous post, we presented a basic framework for analyzing the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations on quantifying financial remedies. We argued that the treatment of foreign exchange should be consistent with the principal underlying the financial remedy being awarded;...
Foreign Exchange Issues in Damage Quantification: Part I – Basic Concepts
International trade is an increasingly important part of the Canadian economy, as this picture clearly shows: As a result, it is not uncommon for litigation to involve the quantification of financial remedies across multiple political and monetary boundaries. How does...
Adding up the Damage: Lost Profits vs. Business Value
When a business is destroyed as a result of wrongdoing, there are two commonly used methods by which the plaintiff’s damages may be measured. One method is to appraise the value of the plaintiff’s business at the date of loss;...
Court Breaks with Apportionment
The case of Varco Canada Limited v. Pason Systems Corp., 2013 FC 750 (CanLII) involved an award of over $52M based on an accounting of the defendant’s profits. Perhaps more importantly, the decision sheds light on a number of conceptual...
Calculated Risk: A $75M Award Adds Urgency to Pre-Judgment Interest Considerations
Pre-judgment interest is often the last thing litigants ponder. A recent award of $75 million in pre-judgment interest in Eli Lilly v. Apotex, 2014 FC 1254 (“Cefaclor”) may change that. Cefaclor involved the infringement of patents for an antibiotic. Damages...
Top 10 Most Common Errors in Damage Quantification – #2: “Build It and He Will Come”
I have already written, in another context, about the interaction between physical assets and lost profits. I want to explore the issue from a couple of additional angles. In the 1989 film Field of Dreams, Kevin Costner’s character hears a voice telling him...
Pre-Judgment Interest, Part III: Property Damage, Profit, and PJI
My practice involves a lot of work for property insurance companies. When damage to property occurs, the property owner may advance a claim against the third party tortfeasor for both the value of the damaged property as well as an...
Pre-Judgment Interest, Part II – Interest and Taxes
In the previous post, I discussed the large pre-judgment interest award in Cefaclor. In that case, one of the issues raised by defendant’s counsel was that to award the plaintiff compound interest would result in overpayment; since the damages award is...
Pre-Judgment Interest: Part I: Establishing a Rate – A Basic Framework
This post on pre-judgment interest deals with the basic question: what is the best method by which to calculate a pre-judgment interest rate? The Law Pre-judgment interest is interest that is added to a plaintiff’s monetary award in respect of...
Pre-Judgment Interest: Introduction
Pre-judgment interest is possibly the least sexy topic imaginable. But there is perhaps no better vehicle for a discussion of the fundamental issues involved in financial loss quantification. A short article of mine dealing with a very large PJI award (over...
Financial Statements, Disclosure and the Arthur Wishart Act
The topic of what types of financial statements must be included in a disclosure document in order to comply with the disclosure requirements of the Arthur Wishart Act (“AWA”) was discussed at a recent dinner put on by the OBA’s Franchise Law section....
Top 10 Most Common Errors in Damages Calculations – #1: Failure to Consider Saved Expenses
Towards the end of the Great War (or World War I as it came to be called), the American president, Woodrow Wilson, proclaimed Fourteen Points outlining his goals for the reconstitution of Europe, and the international state system as a...
Tax Rates, Timing and Damages
In Canada, as a general rule, damages awards are subject to the same tax treatment as the monetary amounts they are meant to replace. For example, awards for lost profits are taxed as business income [1]. Litigation can often take...
Dunkin’ Donuts c. Bertico inc., Part II: Lost Profit & Loss of Business Value
Towards the end of its decision in Dunkin’ Brands Canada Ltd. c. Bertico inc.2015 QCCA 624, the Quebec Court of Appeal discussed the issue of whether an award for both a) lost profits up to 2005 and b) loss of business...
Dunkin’ Donuts c. Berticoinc, Part I: The Benchmark Approach to Lost Profits
In April 2015, the Quebec Court of Appeal released its decision in Dunkin’ Brands Canada Ltd. c. Bertico inc. 2015 QCCA 624. The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s ruling (Bertico inc. c. Dunkin' Brands Canada Ltd., 2012 QCCS 2809) that...
Rescission under the Ontario Arthur Wishart Act: Quantifying the Remedy
It has now been thirteen years since the Ontario Arthur Wishart (Franchise Disclosure) Act, 2000, SO 2000 [1], was enacted. The Act, named after Arthur Wishart, a Conservative MPP who championed the rights of franchisees in the 1970's and 1980's,...
Agricultural Loss – Quantifying Economic Damage for a Hog Farm
Damage quantification for livestock losses can be difficult as it often requires consideration of market price fluctuations, age and weight of livestock at the time of loss and the end purpose of the livestock - considering whether they are for...
Business Interruption Loss – The Interaction between Inventory Losses and Business Interruption Claims
This article explores the areas of overlap between insurance coverage for inventory loss and business interruption. In the event of physical damage to inventory, different policies provide different valuations, including: replacement cost, actual cash value, historical cost or selling price. ...
Proving Rescission Damages under the Provincial Franchise Acts
In October 2012, the Manitoba Franchise Act was proclaimed into law. The legislation, like its counterparts in several other provinces (including Ontario’s Arthur Wishart Act), provides franchisees with the right to rescind a franchise agreement within two years if a...
A New Take on the Accounting of Profits Remedy
The Federal Court’s decision in Merck & Co. v. Apotex Inc. [2013] F.C.J. No. 840, has shed a novel light on to how damages for patent infringement are to be calculated. Previously, in its decision in Monsanto Canada Inc. v....
Clarifying Financial Remedies Under the Arthur Wishart Act
It is almost ten years since the Arthur Wishart (Franchise Disclosure) Act was introduced in Ontario. The Act seeks to protect often unsophisticated purchasers of franchise rights by requiring that certain disclosures be made to franchisees prior to entering into...
Backing out of a Franchise Just Got Easier
Section 6(6) of the Arthur Wishart Act gives franchisees the right to rescind their franchise agreements in the event that they do not receive a disclosure document. Ostensibly, the rescission remedy is designed to return the franchisee to the position...
Quantifying Business Loss Involving Expropriation of Newly Established Businesses
With increasing activity in public works projects in the Greater Toronto Area (e.g. the Toronto-York Spadina Subway extension) and other highway expansions across Ontario, we can expect a large number of businesses to be affected by expropriation. This article will...
Documentation and Litigation
Litigation can be a scary and intimidating process. Preparation is key and includes ensuring that the documentation you need to prove your case is ready at hand. Below are some common forms of litigation and the documentation that should be...
Coinsurance: Can Someone Please Explain This to me Once And For All?
In the US property insurance market, coinsurance, an often-misunderstood concept, refers to the sharing of risk between the insured and the insurer and applies to property damage and business income loss coverage. Coinsurance as it applies to Property Insurance Because...
Fight the Battle on Two Fronts – Liability and Damages
Plaintiff and Defense attorneys are guilty! Guilty of waiting until the last minute to address areas of damages. MDD is very often retained in litigation engagements when the measurement of damages takes a back seat to liability and causation. Although...
Handling Large Complex Claims
Large insurance claims are almost always complex, time-consuming and in need of a forensic accountant. They are complex because of the secondary impact from the misfortune setting off the initial claim. Take, for example, a fire at a ski hill...
The Role of a Forensic Accountant as an Expert Consultant and an Expert Witness
For many years, attorneys on both sides of the courtroom have turned to forensic experts to support their position as well as to identify the potential strengths and weaknesses in the arguments of opposing counsel. Additionally, attorneys can use expert...
Projecting Sales in Business Income Losses is an Art – Not Necessarily a Science
Insurance policies generally state that in determining the Actual Loss Sustained under business income coverage, consideration must be given to actual experience of the business before and the probable experience thereafter had no loss occurred. Thus, the goal in evaluating...
The Impact of Foreign Exchange Rate Movements on Loss of Profit Claims
Foreign exchange risk has been high on the agenda of CFOs of MNCs for many years. With the expansion of the global economy and diverse influences on exchange rates - such as the current climate of economic uncertainty and fear...
Financial Remedies Under the Arthur Wishart Act
It is almost ten years since the Arthur Wishart (Franchise Disclosure) Act was introduced in Ontario. The Act seeks to protect often unsophisticated purchasers of franchise rights by requiring that certain disclosures be made to franchisees prior to entering into...
