Dunkin’ Donuts c. Bertico inc., Part II: Lost Profit & Loss of Business Value
20 July, 2015-
Ephraim Stulberg -
Canada
Towards the end of its decision in Dunkin’ Brands Canada Ltd. c. Bertico inc.2015 QCCA 624, the Quebec Court of Appeal discussed the issue of whether an award for both a) lost profits up to 2005 and b) loss of business value as at 2005 represented a form of double-counting [219-222]. It rejected the defendant’s arguments on this front, noting that the defendant failed to substantiate the argument on appeal, while its evidence at trial on this point was “confused” [220]. The issue of the interaction between lost profits versus loss of business value is one of the more controversial (and confusing) issues currently at play in my field, and I have discussed it elsewhere (see here). In this post, I examine the issue of lost profits, business value and the overlap between them in the specific context of the Dunkin’ Donuts case and the objections raised by the defendants both at trial and on appeal.
The Arguments
At trial, the plaintiffs argued that in addition to their lost profits up to a particular date in 2005, they had also suffered a loss in the value of their respective businesses. The plaintiffs introduced non-expert evidence that as a “rule of thumb”, Dunkin’ Donuts franchises typically sold for an amount equal to 50% of the prior year’s revenue. They argued that as a result of the actions of the defendant, the value of their stores had declined to essentially $nil. The trial judge accepted these arguments, and awarded each store an amount equal to 50% of the projected sales at that store but for the actions of the defendant.
The defendants offered a number of arguments against the plaintiff’s approach. They argued that:
- The loss of business value should be limited to the “value of the net equity of the shareholders…and not their gross investment in fixed assets” [87]. That is, they argued that the loss to the plaintiffs was equal to the amount of equity capital that had been invested in the business (computed as assets less liabilities as reported on the year-end financial statements), and not the value of the assets of the business on a pre-debt basis.
- The term of each franchise was finite (unlike most businesses, which are assumed to exist into perpetuity), after which substantial renovations and renewal fees would have been payable. These were not taken into account by the plaintiffs.
- The residual value of any assets held by the plaintiffs upon actual sale or closure of their businesses was not deducted.
The Theory
Before commenting on this particular case, it is important to introduce a few key concepts:
- The value of a business (or any income generating asset, really) is a function of a) the magnitude, and b) the risk inherent in, its anticipated future profits (or, more precisely, after-tax cash flows). This is true whether the business is assumed to exist into perpetuity, or whether it is defined by a finite contract period (such as a franchise restaurant).
- Business assets are typically financed by a mix of equity (i.e. shareholders’ money) and debt (i.e. other people’s money). On an accounting balance sheet, Assets = Liabilities (i.e. Debt) + Equity. The market value of a company’s assets will likely differ from the book value. When the profitability of a business is impaired, the value of the assets declines, but the value of debt generally stays the same (unless there is a default).
By way of illustration of the above two points, assume that:
- Two different Dunkin’ Donuts franchises each carry assets (i.e. equipment and leaseholds) with book value of $400,000, which are financed by $200,000 of bank debt and $200,000 of owner’s equity.
- The market value of the assets of a Dunkin’ Donuts location can be estimated at 50% of sales. Better stores may sell for more, less efficient stores may sell for less, but on average if the store is a going concern and earning some level of profit, its assets will sell for 50% of sales.
- But for the defendant’s wrongdoing, sales for Location A would have been $1M in 2005; as a result of the wrongdoing, they declined to only $700,000. Sales for Location B, which was not as profitable, suffered a decline in sales from $600,000 to $400,000. Location A is still moderately profitable, while Location B will likely suffer operating losses on a go-forward basis (assume that $500,000 in annual sales represents a “breakeven point” for a restaurant of this type).
We can show three financial statements for each of the two plaintiffs. Both have assets with book value of $400,000, as shown in the left-most column in the table below. Location A’s assets have declined in value from $500,000 (50% x $1M) to only $350,000 (50% x $700,000). Location B, meanwhile, has ceased to be profitable and no longer has any market value, aside from minor residual value for its used restaurant equipment.
Application of the Theory
In Dunkin’ Donuts, the trial judge assessed the past loss of profit as the difference between the profits that would have been earned but for the breaches by the franchisor and the actual profits earned up to 2005. The question is, what are the losses from 2005 onwards? Conceptually, the losses were equal to the difference between:
- The present value of the future cash flows the businesses would have generated from 2005 onwards (i.e. the businesses’ value “but for” the incident); and
- The cash flows the businesses actually did experience from 2005 onwards.
The “But for” Value
With respect to the “but for” value, the trial judge ruled that but for the wrongdoing, each plaintiff’s business would have been worth an amount equal to 50% of the business’s sales in 2005. Note that this is an asset value; it is the value of the plaintiff’s business assets, before any deduction of debts. The level of debt does not change based on the decline in sales.
While the defendant argued that applying a “rule of thumb” was inappropriate, and that it was necessary to consider the individual aspects of each business in order to determine the decline in value, in many ways the Dunkin’ Donuts case – in which losses for a large, disparate group of franchises were being quantified, and individual characteristics of each store could reasonably be assumed to cancel each other out – was the perfect venue for a “rule of thumb” valuation. Moreover, the 50% “rule of thumb” (assuming it accurately represented the average multiple at which franchises changed hands) would take into account such issues as renovations and renewals.
The Actual Value
In theory, the judge should have compared this “but for” asset value with the actual value of each franchise in 2005 in light of the precipitous decline in sales. This is particularly so in the case of Location A, which continues to operate at a profit. Even location B may have some residual asset value. This is essentially the objection of the defendant. The defendant argued that Location A’s loss was only $500,000 – $350,000 = $150,000, and not $500,000 – $0 = $500,000.
This objection would have been valid if the plaintiffs all sold their businesses immediately in 2005. But this is not (apparently) what actually happened.
Let us assume that Locations A and B continued to operate for several more years. Assume – perhaps optimistically – that Location A continues to earn sales of $700,000 per year and suffers no further reduction in value. The loss to the owner of Location A will be the difference between her original asset value of $500,000 and the residual value of $350,000 (refer to the table above).
For Location B, things are much different. Recall that the loss in business value to Location B as at 2005 was $300,000, that being the difference between the “but for” value of $300,000 and the actual value of $0. One might ask why we assigned a value of $0 to Location B’s assets, if Location B now projects to run at an annual deficit. The reason is that an asset can never be worth less than $nil; an economically rational owner is assumed to simply walk away from the asset. But suppose that Location B tried to make a “go of it” and suffered operating losses for several years, trying to turn things around. These operating losses will need to be added to Location B’s losses. In all likelihood, Location B lost more than the $300,000 that its assets would have been worth if not for the breaches of Dunkin’ Donuts.
(The one caveat to what I have written in the last paragraph would be if Location B financed its continued losses with bank debt and then managed to negotiate a settlement of that debt for less than its face value).
Conclusion
So, was the trial judge’s decision fair? It is difficult to say with any certainty based solely on the written decision.
If most franchises were like Location A and continued to operate and earn profits from 2005 onwards (albeit at a reduced level), then the loss measured by the trial judge may very well have been overstated.
If, on the other hand, a significant number of businesses decided to labour on after 2005, suffering operating losses in the process, then the actual losses suffered by the plaintiffs may have been higher than the damages award.
Lessons:
- Loss of business value and lost profits can both be claimed as heads of damage without overlapping, so long as they relate to separate time periods.
- A loss of business value is properly measured as the decrease in a business’s operating asset values.
- It is possible, in some instances, for a business to suffer a loss of business value greater than the original value of the assets.
The statements or comments contained within this article are based on the author’s own knowledge and experience and do not necessarily represent those of the firm, other partners, our clients, or other business partners.
Ephraim Stulberg
B.A, M.A, M.BA, CPA, CA, CBV, CFF, Partner/Senior Vice President
- +1 416.366.4968
- estulberg@mdd.com
- Toronto, ON, Canada
Articles
Relevant Articles
Our experts are extremely knowledgeable about thier subject areas and often write educational material and commentary on topical issues they come across.
CAT Insights – The Increasing Risk and Frequency of Wildfires
Depending on where you are located, you are likely to experience some sort of “weather disaster season,” such as hurricane season, cyclone season, tornado season, earthquake season, or wildfire season. I live in California where we have earthquake season, which...
Property Damage and Derechos
On 29th June 2023, a rare type of storm called a "derecho" swept across the Midwest region of the United States, mostly impacting the states of Missouri, Illinois and Iowa. The derecho began as a rotating supercell thunderstorm that spawned...
Benefits of Hindsight when Quantifying Financial Losses
Claims for economic losses arising out of failed real estate developments can be complex to prove, requiring evidence concerning many different aspects of the proposed construction project. There can also be different approaches to quantifying losses. Both of these issues...
Ghosts, Ghouls and Cyber Claims
We usually think of Hallowe’en when October rolls around; however, did you know that October is also cyber security awareness month? NetDiligence recently released the 12th iteration of their Cyber Claims Study. They analyzed approximately 7,500 cyber claims from period...
ESG Disputes and Business Valuation
Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) factors have gained increasing importance in recent years as society has become more aware of how corporate conduct affects stakeholders, the environment and humanity at large. From issues such as climate change to socially responsible...
Business Valuation, Growth Rates and Climate Change: a Case Study of Vail Resorts
This past summer’s heatwaves and wildfires served for many as alarming reminders of climate change. Hotter summers, colder winters, and more hurricanes are amongst the symptoms of a changing global climate[1]. These climatic effects will impact different businesses in different...
Lost Profits Measurement in the Cannabis Industry
What used to be considered an illicit drug in most countries is now a decriminalized plant with some medicinal potential. Cannabis is in the midst of a global transformation into a major industry with massive investment and growth potential. Canada...
Trends in Food and Beverage Related Product Recalls
Numerous large-scale product recalls have captured national, if not global, media attention. One example is the 2008 salmonella outbreak linked to products manufactured by the Peanut Corporation of America. This incident involved the recall of more than 4,000 products produced...
Business Interruption Measurement Considerations in a COVID-19 World
Although hurricane season doesn’t normally conclude until November 30th, we have already exhausted the modern English alphabet in terms of named hurricanes. In the last year, we’ve also seen an ever increasing number of wildfires, explosions and tropical storms. While...
Claim Considerations Related to the Beirut Port Explosion – Part 2
On 17 October 2019 large numbers of protesters began appearing in Martyrs Square, Nejmeh Square, and Hamra Street, as well as many other areas of Beirut and throughout Lebanon. The reasons for the protests are wide reaching from a social,...
Claim Considerations Related to the Beirut Port Explosion – Part 1
In this two-part series, we write about the claim considerations related to the Beirut port explosion on 4 August 2020. On 4 August 2020 at approximately 18:00 local time, an explosion measuring 3.3 on the Richter scale ripped through Beirut...
COVID-19’s Impact On Business Valuation
This is the second blog post co-authored by MDW Law Partner, Christine Doucet, and MDD Forensic Accountants Partner, Jarrett Reaume, addressing various aspects of COVID-19’s impact on business owners and family law issues. Their first blog post was “Guideline Income...
Is Kylie Jenner a Billionaire, or Even Close? Part III
I hope this will be the final installment in this series, but one never knows. Back in the summer of 2018, I wrote a short piece questioning a sensational Forbes magazine article claiming that Kylie Jenner was worth $1B, based mainly...
Is Kylie Jenner a Billionaire, or Even Close? Part II
A little over a year ago, I wrote a short blog post taking issue with a Forbes magazine article that had concluded that Kylie Jenner's net worth was around $900 million. In light of last week’s news that Coty Inc., a publicly traded cosmetics firm, is...
How Forensic Accountants Can Help You Manage and Effectively Resolve Litigation Cases
If you have not worked with forensic accountants before, an understanding of what they do in litigation support and how they differ from other accountants may be surprising to you. Modern television dramas’ common use of the word “forensic” may...
How to Calculate Losses Under Business Interruption Coverage
In this article we provide a brief overview of how to calculate losses under business interruption coverage. Broadly speaking, business interruption (“BI”) insurance coverage is meant to indemnify the insured for the loss of profit it suffers as a result...
Buying Shares in an NFL Player? Business Valuation Principles Still Apply
In my last post, I argued that an investor in Kylie Jenner’s cosmetics company was essentially investing in Ms. Jenner’s personal brand, and that the earnings stream for that brand was of a finite life. The post got me thinking:...
Forensic Accounting Liability Exposures
The below article first appeared in THE STANDARD, New England’s Insurance Magazine. It features excerpts from a presentation given by MDD partners Paul McGowan, CPA, CVA and Jon Ducey, CPA, CVA on the topic of liability claims and other key...
The Unique Perspective of a Certified ‘Forensic CPA’ Arbitrator
Alternate dispute resolution (ADR) is any procedure that is used in matters that would otherwise be settled in a court of law. Examples of ADR include arbitration, mediation, appraisal, and mini-trial. ADR is a dispute resolution strategy with applications to...
Economic Damages from Personal Injury: A Forensic Accountant’s Perspective
Regrettably, individuals can experience a temporary or permanent diminishment in their ability to perform certain functions due to a tortfeasor. Forensic accountants and economists are regularly retained in matters involving the injury or death of an individual for the purpose...
Is Kylie Jenner Really a Billionaire, Or Even Close?
A few weeks ago, Forbes created a social media storm when it proclaimed that Kylie Jenner was poised to become the world’s youngest self-made billionaire. Many thumbs were worn out debating the appropriateness of the term “self-made”, and apparently a GoFundMe page...
Caribbean ‘vacation’ for CAT claims
As a global forensic accounting firm, we at MDD have a “boots on the ground” mentality when it comes to quantifying economic damages for catastrophe (“CAT”) claims. The busy hurricane season in 2017 meant that I, along with many of...
Valuing a Franchise System
Valuing a franchise system, or “franchisor”, is in many ways very similar to the valuation of any other type of business; it is a function of the forecasted levels of cash flows that the business will generate, and the risk...
How Much Is Your Business Worth?
As a Chartered Business Valuator (CBV), almost every business owner I meet wants to know the answer to this question: “How much is my business worth?” There can be many reasons for asking this question: they may be planning to...
Mining Claim – All Is Not As It Appears
In this briefing we focus on mining claims, and share our knowledge and technical expertise on one of the loss measurement issues regularly encountered in mining claims, production bottlenecks. What you will learn from reading the article include: How the...
What Type of Business Valuation Do I Need?
In my previous article, I discussed the critical need for business owners to have their business valued by a professional appraiser. In this article I will discuss the two types of business appraisals that you might want to consider. Calculation...
Should I Have My Business Valued?
What's so important about having a valuation of my company? Small business owners spend most of their time IN THEIR business and not ON THEIR business. Further, they view expending money on getting a professional valuation performed as a completely...
Identifying and Measuring Short Duration Business Interruption Losses
What have we really lost? One of the most common issues that arise from short-duration interruptions, those measured in days as opposed to weeks or months, is whether the business actually suffered a permanent loss of revenue or whether the...
Contaminated Products Insurance Claims: How to Check the Costs of a Product Recall
The number of food product recalls reported in the UK through the FSA (Food Standards Agency) rose 78% in 2015. With many UK businesses operating internationally, a product recall situation can impact many countries and cost millions of pounds in...
Business Interruption: Complex Interdependencies
As business structures become more complex, companies often need more sophisticated insurance products to properly manage their business interruption risks. For example, narrow vertical integration makes risk management more difficult and increases the demands placed on insurers regarding correct risk...
Catastrophe Events and Business Interruption Insurance
In the event of a devastating catastrophe (“cat”) be it an earthquake, hurricane, flood, or tornado, the first and foremost priority is to ensure the safety all the people involved. Once this has been established, business owners can then begin...
Business Valuations & Why It Pays To Use Genuine Experts
The Basics Assets have value if they will give rise to future economic benefits. For businesses, these future economic benefits take the form of either the expected net income stream or the amount that could be realised in the short...
A Primer To Accurately Calculating Lost Profits
What Are Lost Profits and How Are They Calculated? Lost profits are economic damages caused by a disruption in business operations. The damages can be the result of a variety of factors, some of which include patent infringement, breach of...
Gift Cards and the Illiquidity Discount – A Valuation Perspective
With the busiest season of the year for retail sales upon us, you are no doubt wondering what to buy for that special someone. If you’re reading this blog – and I have every reason to believe you are –...
I Lost My Customers and It’s Your Fault!
In Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP v. Werbin, 2015, an action was put forward by Schwartz Levitsky Feldman (SLF) claiming loss of profits due to the departure of Mr. Werbin. The firm contended that they purchased Werbin’s clients when they purchased...
Foreign Exchange Issues in Damage Quantification: Part II – Applying the Concepts
In the previous post, we presented a basic framework for analyzing the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations on quantifying financial remedies. We argued that the treatment of foreign exchange should be consistent with the principal underlying the financial remedy being awarded;...
Foreign Exchange Issues in Damage Quantification: Part I – Basic Concepts
International trade is an increasingly important part of the Canadian economy, as this picture clearly shows: As a result, it is not uncommon for litigation to involve the quantification of financial remedies across multiple political and monetary boundaries. How does...
The Dividend Double Count
In this post, I touch on a common error I encounter in dealing with a financial analysis of multiple companies owned by the same group or individual. I call this error the “dividend double count”, for reasons that will become...
Adding up the Damage: Lost Profits vs. Business Value
When a business is destroyed as a result of wrongdoing, there are two commonly used methods by which the plaintiff’s damages may be measured. One method is to appraise the value of the plaintiff’s business at the date of loss;...
Court Breaks with Apportionment
The case of Varco Canada Limited v. Pason Systems Corp., 2013 FC 750 (CanLII) involved an award of over $52M based on an accounting of the defendant’s profits. Perhaps more importantly, the decision sheds light on a number of conceptual...
Calculated Risk: A $75M Award Adds Urgency to Pre-Judgment Interest Considerations
Pre-judgment interest is often the last thing litigants ponder. A recent award of $75 million in pre-judgment interest in Eli Lilly v. Apotex, 2014 FC 1254 (“Cefaclor”) may change that. Cefaclor involved the infringement of patents for an antibiotic. Damages...
Personal Injury Losses and the Self-employed: A Business Valuation Perspective on Labour & Capital
Business valuation concepts can be critical for the proper quantification of personal injury damages, particularly in the context of self-employed individuals. Business valuators are commonly called upon to assess the fair market value of small, owner-managed businesses. One of the...
5 Ways You Should Be Using Your Financial Expert
Moore v. Getahun 2015 ONCA 55 is a case that has already generated a lot of discussion and navel gazing in both the legal and expert communities, and I hesitated for quite a while before deciding that I had anything worthwhile to...
Top 10 Most Common Errors in Damage Quantification – #2: “Build It and He Will Come”
I have already written, in another context, about the interaction between physical assets and lost profits. I want to explore the issue from a couple of additional angles. In the 1989 film Field of Dreams, Kevin Costner’s character hears a voice telling him...
Pre-Judgment Interest, Part III: Property Damage, Profit, and PJI
My practice involves a lot of work for property insurance companies. When damage to property occurs, the property owner may advance a claim against the third party tortfeasor for both the value of the damaged property as well as an...
Pre-Judgment Interest, Part II – Interest and Taxes
In the previous post, I discussed the large pre-judgment interest award in Cefaclor. In that case, one of the issues raised by defendant’s counsel was that to award the plaintiff compound interest would result in overpayment; since the damages award is...
Pre-Judgment Interest: Part I: Establishing a Rate – A Basic Framework
This post on pre-judgment interest deals with the basic question: what is the best method by which to calculate a pre-judgment interest rate? The Law Pre-judgment interest is interest that is added to a plaintiff’s monetary award in respect of...
Pre-Judgment Interest: Introduction
Pre-judgment interest is possibly the least sexy topic imaginable. But there is perhaps no better vehicle for a discussion of the fundamental issues involved in financial loss quantification. A short article of mine dealing with a very large PJI award (over...
Financial Statements, Disclosure and the Arthur Wishart Act
The topic of what types of financial statements must be included in a disclosure document in order to comply with the disclosure requirements of the Arthur Wishart Act (“AWA”) was discussed at a recent dinner put on by the OBA’s Franchise Law section....
Top 10 Most Common Errors in Damages Calculations – #1: Failure to Consider Saved Expenses
Towards the end of the Great War (or World War I as it came to be called), the American president, Woodrow Wilson, proclaimed Fourteen Points outlining his goals for the reconstitution of Europe, and the international state system as a...
Tax Rates, Timing and Damages
In Canada, as a general rule, damages awards are subject to the same tax treatment as the monetary amounts they are meant to replace. For example, awards for lost profits are taxed as business income [1]. Litigation can often take...
Dunkin’ Donuts c. Bertico inc., Part II: Lost Profit & Loss of Business Value
Towards the end of its decision in Dunkin’ Brands Canada Ltd. c. Bertico inc.2015 QCCA 624, the Quebec Court of Appeal discussed the issue of whether an award for both a) lost profits up to 2005 and b) loss of business...
Dunkin’ Donuts c. Berticoinc, Part I: The Benchmark Approach to Lost Profits
In April 2015, the Quebec Court of Appeal released its decision in Dunkin’ Brands Canada Ltd. c. Bertico inc. 2015 QCCA 624. The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s ruling (Bertico inc. c. Dunkin' Brands Canada Ltd., 2012 QCCS 2809) that...
Untying the Knot: A Forensic Accountant’s View of Divorce Proceedings
During the course of matrimonial disputes, there are often situations where solicitors find it helpful to engage specialist investigators and appraisers. In particular, forensic accountants can help to provide the court with a clearer view of the true financial position...
Rescission under the Ontario Arthur Wishart Act: Quantifying the Remedy
It has now been thirteen years since the Ontario Arthur Wishart (Franchise Disclosure) Act, 2000, SO 2000 [1], was enacted. The Act, named after Arthur Wishart, a Conservative MPP who championed the rights of franchisees in the 1970's and 1980's,...
Agricultural Loss – Quantifying Economic Damage for a Hog Farm
Damage quantification for livestock losses can be difficult as it often requires consideration of market price fluctuations, age and weight of livestock at the time of loss and the end purpose of the livestock - considering whether they are for...
Business Interruption Loss – The Interaction between Inventory Losses and Business Interruption Claims
This article explores the areas of overlap between insurance coverage for inventory loss and business interruption. In the event of physical damage to inventory, different policies provide different valuations, including: replacement cost, actual cash value, historical cost or selling price. ...
Proving Rescission Damages under the Provincial Franchise Acts
In October 2012, the Manitoba Franchise Act was proclaimed into law. The legislation, like its counterparts in several other provinces (including Ontario’s Arthur Wishart Act), provides franchisees with the right to rescind a franchise agreement within two years if a...
A New Take on the Accounting of Profits Remedy
The Federal Court’s decision in Merck & Co. v. Apotex Inc. [2013] F.C.J. No. 840, has shed a novel light on to how damages for patent infringement are to be calculated. Previously, in its decision in Monsanto Canada Inc. v....
Accounting For Attorneys
It is becoming increasingly important for attorneys to understand financial statements and their relevance to various types of business and legal situations. The non-accountant attorney will greatly benefit from a basic understanding of the key principles of accounting. Equally important...
Clarifying Financial Remedies Under the Arthur Wishart Act
It is almost ten years since the Arthur Wishart (Franchise Disclosure) Act was introduced in Ontario. The Act seeks to protect often unsophisticated purchasers of franchise rights by requiring that certain disclosures be made to franchisees prior to entering into...
Backing out of a Franchise Just Got Easier
Section 6(6) of the Arthur Wishart Act gives franchisees the right to rescind their franchise agreements in the event that they do not receive a disclosure document. Ostensibly, the rescission remedy is designed to return the franchisee to the position...
Quantifying Business Loss Involving Expropriation of Newly Established Businesses
With increasing activity in public works projects in the Greater Toronto Area (e.g. the Toronto-York Spadina Subway extension) and other highway expansions across Ontario, we can expect a large number of businesses to be affected by expropriation. This article will...
Documentation and Litigation
Litigation can be a scary and intimidating process. Preparation is key and includes ensuring that the documentation you need to prove your case is ready at hand. Below are some common forms of litigation and the documentation that should be...
Coinsurance: Can Someone Please Explain This to me Once And For All?
In the US property insurance market, coinsurance, an often-misunderstood concept, refers to the sharing of risk between the insured and the insurer and applies to property damage and business income loss coverage. Coinsurance as it applies to Property Insurance Because...
Fight the Battle on Two Fronts – Liability and Damages
Plaintiff and Defense attorneys are guilty! Guilty of waiting until the last minute to address areas of damages. MDD is very often retained in litigation engagements when the measurement of damages takes a back seat to liability and causation. Although...
Handling Large Complex Claims
Large insurance claims are almost always complex, time-consuming and in need of a forensic accountant. They are complex because of the secondary impact from the misfortune setting off the initial claim. Take, for example, a fire at a ski hill...
The Role of a Forensic Accountant as an Expert Consultant and an Expert Witness
For many years, attorneys on both sides of the courtroom have turned to forensic experts to support their position as well as to identify the potential strengths and weaknesses in the arguments of opposing counsel. Additionally, attorneys can use expert...
Projecting Sales in Business Income Losses is an Art – Not Necessarily a Science
Insurance policies generally state that in determining the Actual Loss Sustained under business income coverage, consideration must be given to actual experience of the business before and the probable experience thereafter had no loss occurred. Thus, the goal in evaluating...
The Impact of Foreign Exchange Rate Movements on Loss of Profit Claims
Foreign exchange risk has been high on the agenda of CFOs of MNCs for many years. With the expansion of the global economy and diverse influences on exchange rates - such as the current climate of economic uncertainty and fear...
Business Valuations: When You Would Need One
Business valuations in one form or another have been around for decades. As a result of the Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Internal Revenue Service began issuing memorandums and directives relating to methods for determining values and...
Financial Remedies Under the Arthur Wishart Act
It is almost ten years since the Arthur Wishart (Franchise Disclosure) Act was introduced in Ontario. The Act seeks to protect often unsophisticated purchasers of franchise rights by requiring that certain disclosures be made to franchisees prior to entering into...
